| img src="0.gif" |
THE PATH
OF PURIFICATION
(VISUDDHIMAGGA)
Chapter XVII: Conclusion
DESCRIPTION OF THE SOIL IN WHICH
UNDERSTANDING GROWS
(Panna-bhumi-niddesa)
[Section C. -
The Wheel of Becoming]
[i. The Wheel]
273. Now here at the end sorrow, etc.,
are stated. Consequently the ignorance stated at the beginning of the Wheel
of Becoming thus, 'With ignorance as condition there are formations', is
established by the sorrow and so on. So it should according be understood
that
Becoming's
Wheel reveals no known beginning;
No
maker, no experiencer there;
Void
with a twelvefold voidness, and nowhere
It
ever halts; for ever it is spinning.
274. But (1) How is ignorance established by sorrow etc.?
(2) How has this Wheel of Becoming no known beginning? (3) How is there
no maker or experiencer there? (4) How is it void with twelve-fold voidness?
275. 1. Sorrow, grief and despair are inseparable from
ignorance; and lamentation is found in one who is deluded. So firstly
when these are established, ignorance is established. Furthermore, 'With
the arising of cankers there is the arising of ignorance' (M.i,54) is
said, and with arising of cankers these things beginning with sorrow come
into being. How?
276. Firstly sorrow about separation from sense desires
as object has its arising in the canker of sense desire, according as
it is said,
'If,
desiring and lusting his desires elude him,
'He
suffers as though an arrow had pierced him' (Sn.767)
and according as it is said 'Sorrow springs from sense desires'
277. (Dh.215). And all these come about with the arising
of the canker of views, according as it is said 'In one who [577] posseses
[the view] "I am materiality", "My mentality", with the change and transformation
of materiality there arise sorrow and lamentation, pain, grief and despair'
(S.iii,3).
278. And as with the arising of the canker of views,
so also with the arising of the canker of becoming, according as it
is said 'Then whatever deities there are, long-lived, beautiful, blissful,
long-resident in grand palaces, when they hear the Perfect One's teaching
of the Dhamma, they feel fear, anxiety and a sense of urgency' (S.iii,85),
as in the case of dieties harassed by the fear of death on seeing the
five signs.
{43}
279. And as with the arising of the canker of becoming,
so also with the canker of ignorance, according as it is said 'The fool,
bhikkhus, experiences pain and grief here and now in three ways' (M.iii,163).
Now these states come about with the arising of cankers,
and so when they are established, they establish the cankers which are
the cause of ignorance. And when the cankers are established, ignorance
is also established because it is present when its condition is present.
This in the first place is how ignorance, etc., should be understood to
be established by sorrow and so on.
280. 2. But when ignorance is established since it is
present when its condition is present, and when 'with ignorance as condition
there are formations; with formations as condition, consciousness', there
is no end to the succession of cause with fruit in this way. Consequently
the Wheel of Becoming with its twelve factors, revolving with the linking
of cause and effect, is established as having 'no known beginning'.
281. This being so, are not the words 'With ignorance as condition
there are formations' as an exposition of a simple beginning contradicted?
- This is not an exposition of a simple beginning. It is an exposition
of a basic state (see §107). For ignorance is the basic state for
the three rounds (see 298). It is owing to his seizing ignorance that the
fool gets caught in the round of the remaining defilement, in the rounds
of kamma, etc., just as it is owing to seizing a snake's head that the
arm gets caught in [the coils of] the rest of the snake's body. But when
the cutting off of ignorance is effected, he is liberated from them just
as the arm caught [in the coils] is liberated when the snake's head is
cut off according as it is said, 'With the remainderless fading away and
cessation of ignorance' (S.ii,1), and so on. So this is an exposition
of the basic state whereby there is bondage for him who grasps it, and
liberation for him who lets go: it is not an exposition of a simple beginning.
This is how the Wheel of Becoming should be understood
to have no known beginning. [578]
282. 3. This Wheel of Becoming consists in the occurrence
of formations, etc., with ignorance, etc., as the respective reasons.
Therefore it is devoid of a maker supplementary to that, such as a Brahmaa
conjectured thus, 'Brahmaa the Great, the Highest, the Creator' (D.i,18),
to perform the function of Maker of the round of rebirths; and it is devoid
of any self as an experiencer of pleasure and pain conceived thus 'This
self of mine that speaks and feels' (Cf.M.i,8). This is how it should
be understood without any maker or experiencer.
283. 4. However, ignorance - and likewise the factors
consisting of formations, etc. - is void of lastingness since its nature
is to rise and fall, and it is void of beauty since it is defiled and
causes defilement, and it is void of pleasure since it is oppressed by
rise and fall, and it is void of any selfhood susceptible to the wielding
of power since it exists in dependence on conditions. Or ignorance -
and likewise the factors consisting of formations, etc. - is neither
self nor self's nor in self nor possessed of self. That is why this Wheel
of Becoming should be understood thus 'Void with a twelvefold voidness'.
284. After knowing this, again,
Its
roots are ignorance and craving;
Its
times are three as past and so on,
To
which there properly belong
Two,
eight, and two, from its [twelve] factors.
285. The two things, ignorance and craving, should be
understood as the root of this Wheel of Becoming. Of the derivation from
the past, ignorance is the root and feeling the end. And of the continuation
into the future, craving is the root and ageing-and-death the end. It
is twofold, in this way.
286. Herein, the first applies to one whose temperament
is [false] view, and the second to one whose temperament is craving.
For in the round of rebirth ignorance leads those whose temperament favours
[false] view, and craving those whose temperament favours craving. Or
the first has the purpose of eliminating the annihilation view because,
by the evidence of the fruit, it proves that there is no annihilation of
the causes; and the second has the purpose of eliminating the eternity view
because it proves the ageing and death of whatever has arising. Or the first
deals with the child in the womb because it illustrates successive occurrence
[of the faculties], and the second deals with one apparitionally born because
of [their] simultaneous appearance.
287. The past, the present and the future are its three
times. Of these, it should be understood that, according to what is given
as such in the texts, the two factors ignorance and formations belong
to the past time, the eight beginning with consciousness belong to the
present time, and the two, birth and ageing-and-death, belong to the future
time. [579]
288. Again it should be understood thus:
(1)
It has three links with cause, fruit, cause,
As
first parts; and (2) four different sections;
(3)
Its spokes are twenty qualities;
(4) With triple round
it spins for ever.
289. 1. Herein, between formations and rebirth-linking
consciousness there is one link consisting of cause-fruit. Between
feeling and craving there is one link consisting of fruit-cause. And
between becoming and birth there is one link consisting of cause-fruit.
This is how it should be understood that it has three links with cause,
fruit, cause, as first parts.
290. 2. But there are four sections, which are determined
by the beginnings and ends of the links, that is to say, ignorance /
formations is one section; consciousness / mentality-materiality / sixfold-base
/ contact / feeling is the second; craving / clinging / becoming is the
third; and birth / ageing-and-death is the fourth. This is how it should
be understood to have four different sections.
291. 3. Then
(a)
There were five causes in the past,
(b)
And now there is a fivefold fruit;
(c)
There are five causes now as well,
(d)
And in the future fivefold fruit.
It is according to these twenty spokes called 'qualities'
that the words its spokes are twenty qualities should be understood.
292. (a) Herein, [as regards the words] There were
five causes in the past, firstly only these two, namely, ignorance
and formations are mentioned. But one who is ignorant hankers, and hankering,
clings, and with his clinging as condition there is becoming, therefore
craving, clinging and becoming are included as well. Hence it is said:
'In the previous kamma-process becoming, there is delusion, which is
ignorance; there is accumulation, which is formations;
there is attachment, which is craving; there is embracing, which
is clinging; there is volition, which is becoming;
thus these five things in the previous kamma-process becoming are
conditions for rebirth-linking here [in the present becoming]' (Ps.i,52).
293. Herein, In the previous kamma-process becoming
means in kamma-process becoming done in the previous birth. There
is delusion, which is ignorance means that the delusion that there
then was about suffering, etc., deluded whereby the man did the kamma,
was ignorance. There is accumulation, which is formations
means the prior volitions arisen in one who prepares the things necessary
for a gift during a month, perhaps, or a year after he has had the thought
'I shall give a gift'. [580] But it is the volitions of one who is actually
placing the offerings in the recipients' hands that are called 'becoming'.
Or alternatively, it is the volition that is accumulation in six of the
impulsions of a single adverting that is called 'formations', and the seventh
volition is called 'becoming'. Or any kind of volition is called 'becoming'
and the accumulations associated therewith are called 'formations'.
There is attachment, which is craving means that in one
performing kamma whatever attachment there is and aspiration for its fruit
as rebirth-process becoming is craving. There is embracing,
which is clinging means that the embracing, the grasping, the adherence,
which is a condition for kamma-process becoming and occurs thus 'By doing
this I shall preserve, or I shall cut off, sense desire in such and such
a place', is called clinging. There is volition, which is becoming
means the kind of volition stated already at the end of the [sentence
dealing with] 'accumulation' is 'becoming'. This is how the meaning should
be understood.
294. (b) And now there is a fivefold fruit (§291)
means what is given in the text beginning with consciousness and ending
with feeling, according as it is said: 'Here [in the present becoming]
there is rebirth-linking, which is consciousness; there is descent
[into the womb], which is mentality-materiality; there
is sensitivity, which is sense-base; there is what is
touched, which is contact; there is what is felt, which
is feeling; thus these five things here in the [present] rebirth-process
becoming have their conditions
{44}
in kamma done in the past' (Ps.i,52).
295. Herein, there is rebirth-linking, which is consciousness
means that is what is called 'rebirth linking' because it arises
linking the next becoming that is consciousness. There is descent
[into the womb], which is mentality-materiality means that is what
consists in the descent of the material and immaterial states into a womb,
their arrival and entry as it were that is mentality-materiality. There
is sensitivity, which is sense base; this is said of the five bases beginning
with the eye. There is what is touched, which is contact
means that it is what is arisen when an object is touched or in the touching
of it, that is contact. There is what is felt, which is feeling
means that is what is felt as results [of kamma] that is arisen together
with rebirth linking consciousness, or with the contact that has the sixfold
base as its condition, that is feeling. Thus should the meaning be understood.
296. (c) There are five causes now as well (§291)
means craving, and so on. Craving, clinging and becoming are given in
the text. But when becoming is included, the formations that precede it
or that are associated with it are included too. And by including craving
and clinging, the ignorance associated with them, deluded by which a man
performs kamma, is included too. So they are five. Hence it is said 'Here
[in the present becoming] with the maturing of the bases there is delusion,
which is ignorance; there is accumulation which is formations;
there is attachment, which is craving; there is embracing,
which is clinging; there is volition, which is becoming;
thus these five things here in the [present] kamma-process becoming
are conditions for rebirth-linking in the future' (Ps.i,52). [581]
Herein, the words Here [in the present becoming]
with the maturing of the bases point out the delusion existing at
the time of the performance of the kamma in one whose bases have matured.
The rest is clear.
297. (d) And in the future fivefold fruit: the
five beginning with consciousness. These are expressed by the term 'birth'.
But 'ageing-and-death' is the ageing and the death of these [five]
themselves. Hence it is said 'In the future there is rebirth-linking,
which is consciousness; there is descent [into the womb],
which is mentality-materiality; there is sensitivity,
which is sense-base; there is what is touched, which is
contact; there is what is felt, which is feeling; thus
these five things in the future rebirth-process becoming have their condition
{44}
in kamma done here [in the present becoming]' (Ps.i,52).
So this [Wheel of Becoming] has twenty spokes with these
qualities.
298. 4. With triple round it spins for ever (§288):
here formations and becoming are the round of kamma. Ignorance,
craving and clinging are the round of defilements. Consciousness,
mentality-materiality, sixfold base, contact and feeling are the round
of result. So this Wheel of Becoming, having a triple round with these
three rounds, should be understood to spin, revolving again and again,
for ever; for the conditions are not cut off as long as the round of defilement
is not cut off.
299. As it spins thus,
(1)
As to the source in the [four] truths,
(2)
As to function, (3) prevention, (4) similes,
(5)
Kinds of profundity, and (6) methods,
It
should be known accordingly.
300. 1. Herein, [as to source in the truths:] profitable
and unprofitable kamma are stated in the Saccavibha"nga (Vbh. 106f.)
without distinction as the origin of suffering and so formations due
to ignorance [stated thus] 'With ignorance as condition there are formations'
are the second truth with the second truth as source. Consciousness due
to formations is the first truth with the second truth as source. The
states beginning with mentality-materiality and ending with resultant
feeling, due respectively to consciousness, etc., are the first truth
with the first truth as source. Craving due to feeling is the second
truth with the first truth as source. Clinging due to craving is the
second truth with the second truth as source. Becoming due to clinging
is first and second truths with the second truth as source. Birth due
to becoming is the first truth with the second truth as source. Ageing-and-death
due to birth is the first truth with the first truth as source. This in
the first place is how [the Wheel of Becoming] should be known 'as to ...
source in the four truths' in whichever way is appropriate.
301. 2. [As to function:] ignorance confuses beings
about physical objects [of sense-desire] and is a condition for the manifestation
of formations; likewise [kamma-]formations [582] form the formed and
are a condition for consciousness; consciousness recognizes an object
and is a condition for mentality-materiality; mentality-materiality is
mutually consolidating and is a condition for the sixfold base; the sixfold
base occurs with respect to its own [separate] objective fields and is a
condition for contact; contact touches an object and is a condition for feeling;
feeling experiences the stimulus of the object and is a condition for craving;
craving lusts after lust-arousing things and is a condition for clinging;
clinging clings to clinging-arousing things and is a condition for becoming;
becoming flings beings into the various kinds of destiny and is a condition
for birth; birth gives birth to the aggregates owing to its occurring as
their generation and is a condition for ageing-and-death; and ageing-and-death
ensures the decay and dissolution of the aggregates and is a conditon
for the manifestation of the next becoming because it ensures sorrow,
etc.
{45}
- So this [Wheel of Becoming] should be known accordingly as
occurring in two ways 'as to function' in whichever way is appropriate
to each of its parts.
302. [As to prevention:] the clause 'With ignorance
as condition there are formations' prevents seeing a maker; the clause
'With formations as condition, consciousness' prevents seeing the transmigration
of a self; the clause 'With consciousness as condition, mentality-materiality'
prevents perception of compactness because it shows the analysis of the
basis conjectured to be 'self'; and the clauses beginning 'With mentality-materiality
as condition, the sixfold base' prevent seeing any self that sees, etc.,
cognizes, touches, feels, craves, clings, becomes, is born, ages and
dies - So this Wheel of Becoming should be known 'as to prevention' of
wrong seeing appropriately in each instance.
303. 4. [As to simile:] ignorance is like a blind
man because there is no seeing states according to their specific general
characteristics; formations with ignorance as condition are like the
blind man's stumbling; consciousness with formations as condition is
like the stumbler's falling; mentality-materiality with consciousness
as condition is like the appearance of a tumour on the fallen man; the
sixfold base with mentality-materiality as condition is like a gathering
that makes the tumour burst; contact with the sixfold base as condition
is like hitting the gathering in the tumour; feeling with contact as
condition is like the pain due to the blow; craving with feeling as condition
is like longing for a remedy; clinging with craving as condition is like
seizing what is unsuitable through longing for a remedy; [583] becoming
with clinging as condition is like applying the unsuitable remedy seized;
birth with becoming as condition is like the appearance of a change [for
the worse] in the tumour owing to the application of the unsuitable remedy;
and ageing-and-death with birth as condition is like the bursting of
the tumour after the change.
Or again, ignorance here as 'no theory' and 'wrong theory'
(see §52) befogs beings as a cataract does the eyes; the fool befogged
by it involves himself in formations that produce further becoming,
as a cocoon-spinning caterpillar does with the strands of the cocoon;
consciousness guided by a minister establishes himself on a throne; [death]
consciousness conjecturing about the sign of rebirth generates mentality-materiality
in its various aspects in rebirth-linking, as a magician does an illusion;
the sixfold base planted in mentality-materiality reaches growth, increase
and fulfilment, as a forest thicket does planted in good soil; contact
is born from the impingement of the bases, as fire is born from the rubbing
together of fire sticks; feeling is manifested in one touched by contact,
as burning is in one touched by fire; craving increases in one who feels,
as thirst does in one who drinks salt water; one who is parched [with
craving] conceives longing for the kinds of becoming, as a thirsty man
does for drinks; that is his clinging; by clinging he clings to becoming
as a fish does to the hook through greed for the bait; when there is becoming
there is birth, as when there is a seed there is a shoot; and death is certain
for one who is born, as falling down is for a tree that has grown up.
So this Wheel of Becoming should be known thus 'as to
simile' too in whichever way is appropriate.
304. 5. [Kinds of profundity:] now the Blessed
One's word, 'This dependent origination is profound, Aananda, and profound
it appears' (D.ii,55) refers to profundity (a) of meaning, (b) of law,
(c) of teaching, and (d) of penetration. So this Wheel of Becoming should
be known 'as to the kinds of profundity' in whichever way is appropriate.
305. (a) Herein, the meaning of ageing-and-death produced
and originated wth birth as condition is profound owing to difficulty
in understanding its origin with birth as condition thus: Neither does
ageing-and-death not come about from birth, nor, failing birth, does it
come about from something else; it arises [only] from birth with precisely
that nature [of ageing-and-death]. And the meaning of formations produced
and originated with ignorance as condition are treatable in like manner.
That is why this Wheel of Becoming is profound in meaning. This firstly
is the profundity of meaning here. [584] For it is the fruit of a
cause that is called 'meaning' according as it is said 'Knowledge about the
fruit of a cause is the discrimination of meaning' (Vbh.293).
306. (b) The meaning of ignorance as condition for formations
is profound since it is difficult to understand in what mode and on what
occasion
{46}
ignorance is a condition for the several formations ... The
meaning of birth as a condition for ageing-and-death is similarly profound.
That is why this Wheel of Becoming is profound in law. This is the profundity
of law here. For 'law' is a name for cause according
as it is said 'Knowledge about cause is discrimination of law' (Vbh.293).
307. (c) Then the teaching of this [dependent origination]
is profound since it needs to be given in various ways for various reasons,
and none but omniscient knowledge gets fully established in it; for in
some places in the suttas it is taught in forward order, in some in backward
order, in some in forward and backward order, in some in forward or in
backward order starting from the middle, in some in four sections and three
links, in some in three sections and two links and in some in two sections
and one link. That is why this Wheel of Becoming is profound in teaching.
This is the profundity of teaching.
308. (d) Then the individual essences of ignorance, etc.,
owing to the penetration of which, ignorance, etc., are rightly penetrated
as to their specific characteristic, are profound since they are difficult
to fathom. That is why this Wheel of Becoming is profound in penetration.
For here the meaning ignorance as unknowing and unseeing and non-penetration
of the truth is profound; so is the meaning of formation as forming and
accumulating with and without greed; so is the meaning of consciousness
as void, uninterested, and manifestation of rebirth-linking without transmigration;
as is the meaning of mentality-materiality as simultaneous arising, as
resolved into components or not, and as bending [on to an object] (namana)
and being molested (ruppana); so is the meaning
of the sixfold base as predominance, world, door, field, and possession
of objective field; so is the meaning of contact as touching, impingement,
coincidence, and concurrence; so is the meaning of feeling as the experiencing
of the stimulus of an object, as pleasure or pain or neutrality, as soulless,
and as what is felt; so is the meaning of craving as a delighting in, as
a committal to, as a current, as a bindweed, as a river, as the ocean
of craving, and as impossible to fill; so is the meaning of clinging as
grasping, seizing misinterpreting, adhering, and hard to get by; so is the
meaning of becoming as accumulating, forming, and flinging into the various
kinds of generation, destiny, station, and abode; so is the meaning of
birth as birth coming to birth, descent [into the womb], rebirth, and manifestation;
and so is the meaning of ageing-and-death as destruction, fall, break-up
and change. This is profundity of penetration.
309. 6. Then [585] there are four methods of treating
the meaning here. They are (a) the Method of Identity, (b) the Method
of Diversity, (c) the Method of Uninterest,
{47}
and (d) the Method of Ineluctable Regularity. So this Wheel
of Becoming should also be known accordingly 'as to the kinds of method'.
{48}
310. (a) Herein, the non-interruption of the continuity
in this way 'With ignorance as condition there are formations; with formations
as condition, consciousness', just like a seed's reaching the state of
a tree through the state of the shoot, etc., is called the 'Method of
Identity'. One who sees this rightly abandons the annihilation view by
understanding the unbrokenness of the continuity that occurs through the
linking of cause and fruit. And one who sees it wrongly clings to the
eternity view by apprehending identity in the non-interruption of the
continuity that occurs through the linking of cause and fruit.
311. (b) The defining of the individual characteristic
of ignorance, etc., is called the 'Method of Diversity'. One who sees
this rightly abandons the eternity view by seeing the arising of each
new state. And one who sees it wrongly clings to the annihilation view
by apprehending individual diversity in the events in a single continuity
as though it were a broken continuity.
312. (c) The absence of interestedness on the part of ignorance
such as 'Formations must be made to occur by me', or on the part of
formations such as 'Consciousness must be made to occur by us', and
so on, is called the 'Method of Uninterestedness'. One who sees this
rightly abandons the self view by understanding the absence of a maker.
One who sees it wrongly clings to moral-inefficacy-of-action view, because
he does not perceive that the causative function of ignorance, etc., is
established as a law by their respective individual essences.
313. (d) The production of only formations, etc., respectively
and no others with ignorance, etc., as the respective reasons, like
that of curd etc., with milk, etc., as the respective reasons, is called
the 'Method of Ineluctable Regularity'. One who sees this rightly abandons
the no-cause view and the moral-inefficacy-of-action view by understanding
how the fruit accords with its condition. One who sees it wrongly by apprehending
it as non-production of anything from anything, instead of apprehending
the occurrence of the fruit in accordance with its conditions, clings
to the no-cause view and to the doctrine of fatalism.
So this Wheel of Becoming,
As
to source in the [four] Truths,
As
to function, prevention, similies,
Kinds
of profundity, and methods,
Should
be known accordingly.
344. There is no one, even in a dream, who has got out
of the fearful round of rebirths, which is ever destroying like a thunderbolt,
unless he has severed with the knife of knowledge well whetted on the
stone of sublime concentration, this Wheel of Becoming, which offers no
footing owing to its great profundity and is hard to get by owing to the
maze of many methods. [586]
And this has been said by the Blessed One: 'This dependent
origination is profound, Aananda, and profound it appears. And, Aananda,
it is through not knowing, through not penetrating it, that this generation
has become a tangled skein, a knotted ball of thread, root-matted as a
reed bed, and finds no way out of the round of the rebirths, with its states
of loss, unhappy destinies, ... perdition' (D.ii,55).
Therefore, practising for his own and others' benefit
and welfare, and abandoning other duties,
Let
a wise man with mindfulness
So
practice that he may begin
To
find a footing in the deeps
Of
the Dependent Origin.
The seventeenth chapter concluding
'The
Description of the Soil in which Understanding
Grows' in the treatise on the development
of understanding in the Path of Purification
composed for the purpose of gladdening good
people.
[Footnotes]
{43}
Their flowers wither, their clothes get dirty, sweat
comes from their armpits, their bodies become unsightly, and they get
restless (see MA.iv.170).
{44}
As regards these four paragraphs from the Patisambhida
(see §§292, 294, 296 and 298); all four end with the word
'paccayaa' (nom.pl. and abl.s. of paccaya
= condition). In the first and third paragraphs (§§292 and 296)
this is obviously nom. pl. and agrees with the 'ime pa~nca dhammaa'
(these five things). But in the second and fourth paragraphs the context
suggests vipaakaa (results) instead of conditions. However there
is no doubt that the accepted reading is paccayaa here too; the
passages is also quoted in Ch.XIX, §13, in the Sammohavinodani (Paccayaakaara-Vibha"nga
commentary = present context,) and at MA.i,53. The Paramatthama~njuusaa
and Muula-tiikaa do not mention this point. The Saddhammappakaasinii (Pa.tisambhidaa
commentary) comments on the first para: 'Purimakammabhavasmim
ti atiitajaatiyaa kammabhave kariiyamaane pavattaa; idha
pa.tisandhiyaa paccayaa ti paccupannaa pa.tisandhiyaa paccayabhuutaa',
and on the second para 'Idh'upapattibhavasmi.m
pure katassa kammassa paccayaa ti paccupanne vipaakabhave atiitajaatiya.m
katassa kammasa paccayena pavattii ti attho'. The Tiikaa to the Majjima-nikaaya
commentary (MA,i,53) says of the second paragraph 'Ime paccayaa
ti ime vi~n~naa.naadaya pa~nca ko.t.thaasikaa dhammaa, purimabhave katassa,
kammassa, kammavattassa, paccayaa, paccayabhaavato, tam pa.ticca, idha,
etarahi, upapattibhavasmi.m upapattibhavabhaavena vaa hontii ti attho'.
From these comments is is plain enough that 'paccayaa' in the
second and fourth paragraphs is taken as abl. sing. (e.g., avijjaa-paccayaa
sa"nkhaaraa). There is a parallel ablative construction with genitive
at Ps.ii,72,1.8: 'Gatisampattiyaa ~naa"nasampayutte atthanna.m hetuuna"m
paccayaa uppatti hoti'. Perhaps the literal rendering of the second
and fourth paragraphs' final sentence might be: Thus there are these five
things here in the [present] rebirth-process becoming with their condition
[consisting] of kamma done in the past', and so on. The point is unimportant.
{45}
'Sorrow, etc., have already been established as ignorance;
but death consciousness itself is devoid of ignorance and formations
and is not a condition for the next becoming that is why "because it
assures sorrow etc." is said' (Pm.640).
{46}
'Avattha - occasion': not in P.T.S. Dict.
{47}
'Avyaapaara - uninterest': here the equivalent
of anaabhoga, see Ch.IV,§171 and Ch.IX,§108.
The perhaps unorthodox form 'uninterest' has been used to avoid the 'unselfish'
sense sometimes implied by 'disinterestedness'. Vyaapaara
is clearly intended throughout this work as 'motivated action' in
contrast with 'blind action of natural forces.'
{48}
The Dependent Origination, or Stucture of Conditions,
appears as a flexible formula with the intention of describing the
ordinary human situation of a man in his world (or indeed any conscious
event where ignorance and craving have not entirely ceased). That situation
is always complex, since it is implicit that Consciousness with no Object,
or Being (bhava becoming, or however rendered) without Consciousness
(of it), is impossible except as an artificial abstraction. The Dependent
Origination, being designed to portray the essentials of that situation
in the limited dimensions of words and using only elements recognizable
in experience, is not a logical proposition (Descartes' Cogito
is not a logical proposition). Nor is it a temporal cause-and-effect chain:
each memeber has to be examined as to its nature in order to determine what
its relations to the other are (e.g.) whether successive in time or consacent,
positive or negative, etc., etc.). A purely cause-and-effect chain would
not represent the pattern of a situation that is always complex, always subjective-objective,
static-dynamic, positive-negative, and so on. Again, there is no evidence
of any historical development in the various forms given within the limit
of the Sutta Pi.taka (leaving aside the Pa.tisambhidaamagga
), and historical treatment within that particular limit is likely to mislead,
if it is hypothesis with no foundation.
Parallels with European thought have been avoided in
this translation. But perhaps an exception can be made here, with due
caution, in the case of Descartes. The revolution in European thought
started by his formula cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore
I am) is not yet ended. Now it will perhaps not escape notice that the
two elements, 'I think' and 'I am', in what is not a logical proposition
parallel to some extent the two members of the Dependent Origination,
Consciousness and Being (Becoming). In other words, Consciousness activated
by Craving and Clinging as the dynamic factory guided and blinkered by
ignorance ('I think' or 'consciousness with the conceit "I am"') conditions
Being ('therefore I am') in a complex relationship with other factors relating
subject and object (not accounted for by Descartes). The parallel should
not be pushed too far. In fact it is only introduced because in Europe
the Dependent Origination seems to be very largely misunderstood with
many strange interpretations placed upon it, and because the Cogito
does seem to offer some sort of reasonable approach.
In this work, for convenience because of the special
importance attached here to the aspect of the death-rebirth link, the
Dependent Origination is considered from only one standpoint, namely,
as applicable to a period embracing a minimum of three lives. But this
in not the only application. With suitable modifications it is also used
in the Vibha"nga to describe the structure of the Complex in each one
of the 89 single type-consciousnesses laid down in the Dhammasa"nga.nii;
and Bhadantaacariya Buddhaghosa says 'This Structure of Conditions is
present not only in (a continuity period consisting of) multiple consciousness
but also in each consciousness single as well' (VbhA. 199-200). Also the
Pa.tisambhidaamagga gives five expositions, four describing dependent
origination in one life, the fifth being made to present a special inductive
generalization to extend what is observable in this life (the fact that
consciousness is always preceded by consciousness, cf. this Ch. §83f.
- i.e. that it always has a past and is inconceivable without one) back
beyond birth, and (since craving and ignorance ensure its expected continuance)
on after death. There are besides, various other, differing, applications
indicated by the variant forms given in the Suttas themselves.
|