| Kusala is a reality that is virtuous,
harmless. Some might think that we are able to do kusala only when
we have money or other possessions. However, we forget the nature
of generosity. Even without money, if you had things that are useful
to others, would you be able to relinquish them and share them? If
not, is that moment kusala or akusala? Those who do not know that
kusala-citta is a beneficent citta, might regret that they lack funds to
make merit. But in reality even without money to perform dana-kusala,
there still are many other kusala that can be done. Whenever we,
for example, are friendly with others, feel harmonious with them, have
gentleness, kind and sincere words for them, or beneficence towards them,
those are moments of kusala, the completely harmless reality.
Whenever there is mana, or conviction
that one is superior in any way to others or even some delimitation between
"them" and "us", with no benevolence, these are moments of akusala-citta,
citta that are not good, realities that are harmful.
When we really understand the
characteristics of kusala, we are able to develop all kinds of kusala.
Even without money to donate, there still are minor things that can be
conceded. If one really cannot give up things because of one's possessiveness,
but still wants to have a peaceful citta or to eradicate kilesa and become
a sotapanna, would one be able to relinquish anything? Each person
has accumulated kusala and akusala differently. Thus, one should
examine one's citta whether one is still very possessive or can one begin
to sacrifice things to benefit others, little by little. When it
becomes a habit, it would be a powerful paccaya that attenuates clinging
to nama-dhamma and rupa-dhamma that one takes for self, contributing to
the development of panna until panna is sharp and strong enough to realize
nibbana. When those who want to eradicate kilesa (but are still content
when kilesa, such as conceit or jealousy, arises,) are told to attenuate
akusala tendencies and be glad in others' happiness, or to have metta even
for those who are evil, could they do it? Those satisfied to be angry,
degrading, conceited, or jealous, would be unable to do so. To abandon
kilesa is something that cannot be done all at once, but only gradually,
by developing panna to arises little by little. Those who really
want to eradicate kilesa would know how to develop every kind of kusala,
not only practice dana and jealously guard other akusala. Some might
wish for peace because there is much restlessness and agitation each day.
Thoughts bring anger, complications, trouble, and anxiety because there
is no examination of the citta of the moment, but rather of the person
one is angry with. As the way we reflect about others bring akusala,
the citta would become uneasy, agitated, and anxious. When one knows
one is anxious, one desires peace without realizing that if there were
no anger, there would be no unpleasantness. When one is angry, one
feels uneasy, anxious, disturbed, which is akusala, a reality that is harmful.
If we are able to be mindful
at the moment of anger, and examine other people in a way that brings metta,
mudita and upekkha, there could be peace immediately. Because the
moment that citta has metta, mudita or upekkha, is kusala, (without lobha,
dosa or moha,) it is calm. All kusala-citta are peaceful. Therefore,
if one desires to eradicate kilesa, one must develop every kind of kusala,
not only dana-kusala.

[From
Summary of Paramattha-dhamma, Ch. 3, pp. 90-91]
November 1, 2000 |